[DOWNLOAD] "Sandburg-Schiller v. Rosello" by Illinois Appellate Court — First District (5Th Division) Judgment Affirmed # Book PDF Kindle ePub Free

📘 Read Now     📥 Download

eBook details

• Title: Sandburg-Schiller v. Rosello
• Author : Illinois Appellate Court — First District (5Th Division) Judgment Affirmed
• Release Date : January 28, 1983
• Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
• Pages : * pages
• Size : 77 KB

Description

Rehearing denied December 8, 1983. Plaintiffs, owner/landlord and several tenants of an apartment building, filed a three-count complaint against defendant, a co-tenant, to recover damages suffered from a fire which originated in defendant's apartment and spread throughout the building. The three counts of the complaint sounded in negligence (count I), res ipsa loquitor (count II), and wilful and wanton misconduct (count III). The trial court directed a verdict for defendant and against plaintiffs on count III and, pursuant to separate jury verdicts, entered judgment for plaintiffs and against defendant on counts I and II. On appeal, defendant contends that: (1) under Illinois law, a landlord has no cause of action against a tenant for fires occurring during the term of the lease; (2) evidence of defendant's drinking was inadmissible without indicia of intoxication; (3) the trial court improperly limited the cross-examination of various witnesses as to possible causes of the fire; (4) the verdicts were against the manifest weight of the evidence and the trial court erred in denying defendant's motions for a directed verdict, judgment n.o.v. and new trial; and (5) plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of res ipsa loquitor. In the alternative only, plaintiffs cross-appeal, contending that the trial court erred in directing a verdict on count III. In addition, plaintiffs allege that because defendant's notice of appeal was directed only to the jury verdict and not to the denial of the subsequent post-trial motion, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider the substance of the appeal. For the reasons that follow, we find that this court does have jurisdiction and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Free PDF Books "Sandburg-Schiller v. Rosello" Online ePub Kindle